Sr No. | casetype | case_no | caseyear | case_date | case_title | court_name | court_location | urbanestate | case_description | decision | decision_date | decision_brief | appeal_filed | appeal_date | date_of_written_statement | ZoneName | finaldirectionofcourt | final_direction_of_decision | advocate_name | system_file_no |
1
| SLP | 4547 | 2023 | 2023-02-21 00:00:00 | RAJENDER vs. THE STATE OF HARYANA | Supreme Court | Delhi | Faridabad | RAJENDER vs. THE STATE OF HARYANA | Allowed | 2023-04-11 | | | | | Faridabad | | Not Filled | A.G, Office | 2478216 |
2
| COCP | 268 | 2021 | 2021-08-16 00:00:00 | Jagdish Singh (dead) Vs Satish Kumar Yadav and others | Supreme Court | Delhi | Faridabad | Jagdish Singh (dead) Vs Satish Kumar Yadav and others | Disposed off | 2021-09-03 | | | | | Faridabad | | Not Filled | Sh. Alok Sangwan,Advocate | 2124551 |
3
| COCP | 422 | 2021 | 2019-03-11 00:00:00 | Animesh Tewatia Vs Suresh Kumar | Supreme Court | Delhi | Faridabad | Animesh Tewatia Vs Suresh Kumar | Disposed off | 2021-08-27 | | | | | Faridabad | | Not Filled | | 2131351 |
4
| SLP | 11775 | 2022 | 2022-07-28 00:00:00 | HARYANA SHAHARI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN (HSVP) vs. PREM NARAIN DIKSHIT | Supreme Court | Delhi | Faridabad | HARYANA SHAHARI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN (HSVP) vs. PREM NARAIN DIKSHIT | Disposed off | 2023-10-13 | | | | | Faridabad | | Not Filled | HSVP Counsel Sh. Lokesh Sinhal | 2343828 |
5
| SLP | 12251-12252 | 2022 | 2022-07-13 00:00:00 | UNION OF INDIA vs. KRISHNA NAGAR GRAM VIKAS SAMITTEE | Supreme Court | Delhi | Faridabad | UNION OF INDIA vs. KRISHNA NAGAR GRAM VIKAS SAMITTEE | Disposed Off | 2022-11-01 | | | | | Faridabad | | Not Filled | Anil Grover | 2340445 |
6
| COCP | 1252 | 2019 | 2020-02-12 00:00:00 | AJAY MITTAL VS D.SURESH | Supreme Court | Delhi | Faridabad | AJAY MITTAL VS D.SURESH | Disposed Off | 2021-09-01 | | | | | Faridabad | | Not Filled | B.K. Satija, Additional Advocate General | 1813467 |
7
| SLP | 127 | 2023 | 2022-12-22 00:00:00 | HARYANA SHAHARI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN (HSVP) (FORMERLY KNOWN AS HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) vs. | Supreme Court | Delhi | Faridabad | HARYANA SHAHARI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN (HSVP) (FORMERLY KNOWN AS HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) vs. | Disposed off | 2023-01-03 | | | | | Faridabad | | Not Filled | -- | 2496765 |
8
| SLP | 8656 | 2022 | 2022-05-10 00:00:00 | ASHOK PAL vs. THE STATE OF HARYANA | Supreme Court | Delhi | Faridabad | ASHOK PAL vs. THE STATE OF HARYANA | Disposed off | 2022-05-20 | | | | | Faridabad | | Not Filled | A.G, Office | 2352136 |
9
| SLP | 13136 | 2022 | 2022-07-29 00:00:00 | HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN (HSVP) vs. MANISH VASHISHTH | Supreme Court | Delhi | Faridabad | HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN (HSVP) vs. MANISH VASHISHTH | Disposed off | 2023-10-13 | | | | | Faridabad | | Not Filled | HSVP counsel Sh. Lokesh Sinhal | 2343829 |
10
| SLP | 13838 | 2022 | 2022-08-07 00:00:00 | HARYANA SHAHARI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN (HSVP) Vs. MAMTA AGGARWAL | Supreme Court | Delhi | Faridabad | HARYANA SHAHARI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN (HSVP) Vs. MAMTA AGGARWAL | Disposed off | 2023-10-13 | | | | | Faridabad | | Not Filled | HSVP counsel Sh. Lokesh Sinhal | 2343830 |
11
| SLP | 14106 | 2020 | 2020-11-21 00:00:00 | SRS CITY PALWAL AGH BUYER ASSOCIATION VS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | Supreme Court | Delhi | Faridabad | SRS CITY PALWAL AGH BUYER ASSOCIATION VS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | Disposed off | 2020-11-27 | | | | | Faridabad | | Not Filled | DISPOSED OF WITHOUT NOTICE | 1871449 |
12
| SLP | 15093 | 2023 | 2023-07-13 00:00:00 | MANOJ vs. THE STATE OF HARYANA | Supreme Court | Delhi | Faridabad | MANOJ vs. THE STATE OF HARYANA | Allowed | 2024-04-05 | | | | | Faridabad | | Not Filled | AG Office | 2514388 |
13
| D.N. | 20620 | 2021 | 2022-01-10 00:00:00 | RAM CHAND SAINI THROUGH LRS vs. SANJAY JOON | Supreme Court | Delhi | Faridabad | RAM CHAND SAINI THROUGH LRS vs. SANJAY JOON | Disposed Off | 2022-02-18 | | | | | Faridabad | | Not Filled | | 2165400 |
14
| SLP | 22764 | 2020 | 2020-10-16 00:00:00 | HSVP Vs Lal Chand | Supreme Court | Delhi | Faridabad | HSVP Vs Lal Chand | Disposed off | 2021-01-06 | | | | | Faridabad | | Not Filled | | 1863420 |
15
| SLP | 21599 | 2022 | 2022-08-03 00:00:00 | HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN (HSVP) vs. CHANDER KUMAR KAK | Supreme Court | Delhi | Faridabad | HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN (HSVP) vs. CHANDER KUMAR KAK | Disposed off | 2023-10-13 | | | | | Faridabad | | Not Filled | HSVP counsel Sh. Lokesh Sinhal | 2478092 |
16
| CWP | 759 | 2021 | 2021-08-19 00:00:00 | Priwasee Sangthan Vs State of Haryana | Supreme Court | Delhi | Faridabad | Priwasee Sangthan Vs State of Haryana | Disposed off | 2021-11-15 | | | | | Faridabad | | Not Filled | Sh. Arun Bhardwaj, Additional Advocate General | 2127000 |
17
| SLP | 9604 | 2022 | 2022-05-10 00:00:00 | HYDRAULICS AND PNEUMATICS (INDIA) LLP vs. THE STATE OF HARYANA | Supreme Court | Delhi | Faridabad | HYDRAULICS AND PNEUMATICS (INDIA) LLP vs. THE STATE OF HARYANA | Disposed off | 2023-10-31 | | | | | Faridabad | | Not Filled | LOKESH SINHAL | 2352149 |
18
| SLP (C) | 13049 | 2013 | January 1,2002 | HUDA VS JAGDISH RAI | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | POSSESSION OF THE PLOT | Disposed Off | August 10,2004 | disposed of | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | J.P. Dhanda | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2002/0020 |
19
| COCP | 753 | 2017 | May 18,2017 | M/S NBG PRINTOGRAPHIC MACHINERY CO. PVT. LTD. VS. HUDA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | ALLOTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL PLOT IN SECTOR 58, FARIDABAD. | Disposed Off | April 23, 2019 | Dismissed | No | | July 03, 2017 | Faridabad | No | No | Arun Bhardwaj | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2017/0042 |
20
| SLP | 1 | 2017 | April 21,2017 | HUDA VS. KRISHNA SINGLA | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | RESUMPTION DUE TO NON PAYMENT (FOR FILING SLP IN RSA NO.3932/2016) (DIARY NO. 28565 OF 2017) | Disposed Off | October 06, 2017 | dismissed | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | HEMANT GUPTA | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2017/0043 |
21
| SLP | 001 | 2018 | January 25,2016 | HUDA VS. MAMTA MISHRA | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | DIARY NO. 2498 OF 2018 | Disposed Off | July 05, 2018 | Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Delay condoned.
We do not find any merit in this petition.
The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | VIVEK GUPTA | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/00190 |
22
| COCP | 754 | 2017 | June 5,2017 | MUKESH GARG VS. D.P.S. NAGAL | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | THE PETITIONER HAS CLAIMED ALLOTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL PLOT IN SECTOR 58, FARIDABAD AS PER SUPREME COURT ORDER DATED 29.08.2016. | Disposed Off | April 23, 2019 | Dismissed | No | | August 02, 2017 | Faridabad | No | No | Arun Bhardwaj | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2017/0059 |
23
| SLP | 11344 | 2017 | January 2,2016 | TEJ PAL AND ORS ETC ETC VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. ETC ETC | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | (LAC MATTER) FOR ENHANCEMENT COMPENSATION
IT IS A BENCH OF 5 SLPS 11344-11349 OF 2017 | Disposed Off | December 06, 2017 | With the aforesaid observations and
directions, all the appeals are allowed. The 18
impugned judgments and orders of the High Court are
set aside and the matters are remanded to the High
Court for fresh disposal in accordance with the
directions and observations contained in the
present order. The High Court is requested to
decide the matters as expeditiously as its business
would permit | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | - | ADMN/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/00191 |
24
| SLP | 20584 | 2014 | December 11,2014 | LINCK CORPORATION VS. STATE OF HARYANA | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | MATTER OF THIS CASE IS CONNECTED TO SLP (CIVIL) 14524 OF 2014 TITLED AS ASJIT SINGH CHAWLA & ORS. VS STATE OF HARYANA | Disposed Off | December 10,2015 | copy of the order not available on supreme court website | | | | Faridabad | No | No | BANO DESWAL | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2014/00149 |
25
| SLP (CC) | 18888 | 2015 | January 9,2015 | HUDA VS VED PARKASH AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | THE PRESENT SLP IS TO CHALLENGE THE JUDGMENT RENDERED IN CWP NO.8017 OF 1994 AND THIS CWP WAS DECIDED IN TERMS OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.02.2014 PASSED IN CWP NO.13105 OF 1993 AND NOW THE SLP HAS BEEN FILED BY DR. MONIKA GUSAIN AGAINST CWP NO.13105 OF 1993 AND IS PENDING BEFORE REGISTRY SUPREME COURT FOR CORRECTION OF DEFECTS DIARY NO.27263 OF 2015. | Disposed Off | July 31, 2017 | As a last opportunity, two weeks further time is granted to
learned counsel for the petitioners to take fresh steps for
effecting service upon respondent nos.1 to 13, failing which the
special leave petition shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution
without further reference to the Court.
| No | | | Faridabad | No | No | MONICA GOSAIN | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2015/001 |
26
| SLP | 2905 | 2019 | 2019-01-18 00:00:00 | THE STATE OF HARYANA vs. PARVEEN | Supreme Court | Delhi | Faridabad | THE STATE OF HARYANA vs. PARVEEN | Disposed off | 2024-02-09 | | | | | Faridabad | | Not Filled | BIJU THANKAPPEN | 2494275 |
27
| SLP | 15213 | 2017 | July 17,2017 | STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. VS. M/S LION BRAND POULTRIES & ETC | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | POSSESSION OF PROPERTY (SLP-22356/2015)
(JUDGMENT RESERVED VIDE ORDER DATED 13.12.2017) | Disposed Off | February 20, 2018 | Leave Granted & Disposed off | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2017/0060 |
28
| SLP | 21938 | 2016 | August 19, 2016 | VISHNU VS STATE OF HARYANA | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Palwal | LAC MATTER | Disposed Off | February 11, 2017 | DISPOSED off | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | - | ADMN/UE002/SC-DELHI/2016/001 |
29
| SLP | 10024 | 2017 | August 16, 2017 | AHMAD WASI VS. STATE OF HARYANA | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER | Disposed Off | December 06, 2017 | The appeals are disposed of in terms of the
signed order. Consequently, all pending applications
therein are also disposed of. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2017/0061 |
30
| SLP | 12072 | 2017 | April 08, 2017 | SANDEEP GIRDHER VS. STATE OF HARYANA | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER | Disposed Off | July 31, 2017 | dismissed | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | - | ADMN/UE001/SC-DELHI/2017/0062 |
31
| SLP | 12285 | 2017 | July 25, 2016 | SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN VS. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | THIS MATTER WAS LISTED WITH SLP (C) NO. 14039 OF 2015 & WAS DISMISSED VIDE THE SAME ORDER DATED 10.08.2017 | Disposed Off | August 10, 2017 | this matter was listed with SLP (C) No. 14039 of 2015 & was dismissed vide the same order dated 10.08.2017 | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | B.C. BHATT, ADVOCATE | EO/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/00193 |
32
| SLP | 21546 | 2017 | November 16, 2017 | BIRWATI CHOUDHARY AND ORS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAND FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SECTOR 58 WAS ACQUIRED.(ARISING OUT IN CM NO. 10834-CWP OF 2017 IN CWP NO.10546/2016) | Disposed Off | August 20, 2018 | Leave granted.
The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed
Reportable judgment.
Pending applications shall also stand disposed of. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | - | EO/UE001/SC-DELHI/2017/0065 |
33
| SLP | 1440 | 2015 | February 10,2015 | HEERA LAL VS. STATE OF HARYANA | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER(THE APPELLANT APPROACHED THIS COURT CHALLENGING THE LAND ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS. THE MAIN GROUND OF CHALLENGE WAS THAT DISPENSATION OF SECTION 5-A INQUIRY WAS UNJUSTIFIED AND UNWARRANTED. HOWEVER, THE HIGH COURT DECLINED TO INTERFERE WITH THE ACQUISITION. 3. BUT IN THE IMPUGNED ORDER THE HIGH COURT ORDERED THAT THE APPELLANT WOULD BE ENTITLED TO A PLOT AS PER REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT POLICY OF THE GOVERNMENT AS SUBMITTED BY RESPONDENT NOS. 1 TO 3. 4. IN VIEW OF THE EFFLUX OF TIME AND INTERVENING DEVELOPMENTS, WE DO NOT THINK IT WOULD BE PROPER FOR THIS COURT NOW TO CONSIDER THE MATTER ON MERITS. THEREFORE THIS APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NOS. 1 TO 3 TO ALLOT AND HAND OVER A PLOT AS PER REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT POLICY OF THE GOVERNMENT WITHIN A PERIOD OF TWELVE WEEKS FROM TODAY. IN CASE THE SAME IS NOT DONE WITHIN TWELVE WEEKS, THE APPELLANT WILL BE ENTITLED TO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION OF RS.1,000/- PER DAY TILL IT IS HANDED OVER.) | Disposed Off | January 22,2016 | The appellant approached this Court challenging the land acquisition proceedings. The main ground of challenge was that dispensation of Section 5-A inquiry was unjustified and unwarranted. However, the High Court declined to interfere with the acquisition. 3. But in the impugned order the High Court ordered that the appellant would be entitled to a plot as per Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy of the Government as submitted by Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. 4. In view of the efflux of time and intervening developments, we do not think it would be proper for this Court now to consider the matter on merits. Therefore this appeal is disposed of directing the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to allot and hand over a plot as per Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy of the Government within a period of twelve weeks from today. In case the same is not done within twelve weeks, the appellant will be entitled to additional compensation of Rs.1,000/- per day till it is handed over. | No | | | Faridabad | No | Yes | AJAY BANSAL | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2015/002 |
34
| WP | 27 | 2015 | February 18,2015 | JOGINDER KAUR VS. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER | Disposed Off | July 15,2015 | Order is not updated on Supreme Court of India website. | | | | Faridabad | No | No | ADITYA SANGHI | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2015/0030 |
35
| SLP | 31843 | 2015 | March 20,2015 | STATE OF HARYANA VS VANDANA KOHLI | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | RESUMPTION DUE TO NON PAYMENT.
THE FILE OF THIS SLP IS UNDER PROGRESS.THIS CASE IS FILED ON 02.09.2015 OF DIARY NUMBER 29416/2015 BUT DUE TO THE SOME DEFECTS THIS IS PENDING BEFORE REGISTRAR COURT. | Disposed Off | November 2,2015 | DISPOSED OF | | | | Faridabad | No | No | B.K SATIJA ADVOCATE | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2015/0032 |
36
| SLP | 5403 | 2015 | March 12,2015 | HUDA AND ANOTHER VS. SANJAY WADHWA AND ANOTHER | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | RESUMPTION OF PLOT DUE TO NON PAYMENT | Disposed Off | December 11,2015 | disposed | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | PIYUSH HANS | EO/UE001/SC-DELHI/2015/00218 |
37
| SLP | 12156 | 2014 | March 19,2015 | BIRWATI CHAUDHARY AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | January 20,2015 | We see no reason to interfere with the order impugned. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. This order shall not however prevent the petitioners from seeking any redress under the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement, 2013 as amended by the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance, 2014 in accordance with law. We make it clear that we express no opinion as to the merits of any such claim which the petitioners may make before any court or authority. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2015/0033 |
38
| WP | 6 | 2015 | March 21,2015 | SUBODH KUMAR AND ANOTHER VS. UNION OF INIDA | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | July 15,2015 | It is a bunch matter comprising of several Writ Petitions.All the Writ petitions are dismissed except I.A No. 8 and 9 in Writ Petition 876 of 1996 with three months time to file representation/Suit before appropriate authority/Court. Meanwhile status quo to be maintained and liberty to petitioners to approach High Court for redressal of their grievance. | | | | Faridabad | No | No | Arun Bhardwaj | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2015/0053 |
39
| WP | 3 | 2015 | March 21,2015 | JOGINDER SINGH VS. UNION OF INIDA | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | July 15,2015 | It is a bunch matter comprising of several Writ Petitions.All the Writ petitions are dismissed except I.A No. 8 and 9 in Writ Petition 876 of 1996 with three months time to file representation/Suit before appropriate authority/Court. Meanwhile status quo to be maintained and liberty to petitioners to approach High Court for redressal of their grievance. | | | | Faridabad | No | No | Arun Bhardwaj | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2015/0054 |
40
| WP | 2 | 2015 | March 21,2015 | KAMLA DEVI AND OTHERS VS. UNION OF INIDA | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | July 15,2015 | It is a bunch matter comprising of several Writ Petitions.All the Writ petitions are dismissed except I.A No. 8 and 9 in Writ Petition 876 of 1996 with three months time to file representation/Suit before appropriate authority/Court. Meanwhile status quo to be maintained and liberty to petitioners to approach High Court for redressal of their grievance. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | Arun Bhardwaj | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2015/0055 |
41
| SLP | 7246 | 2015 | March 30,2015 | SUBASH AGGARWAL VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER | Disposed Off | January 18,2016 | Application for deletion of the name of Respondent No. 6 is allowed. Leave granted. The Civil Appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed non-reportable Judgment. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, are disposed of. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | B.K SATIJA ADVOCATE | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2015/0058 |
42
| SLP (C) | 18515 | 2015 | April 3,2015 | HUDA VS. JATINDER SOOD | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | RESUMPTION OF SITE.NOW THE CASE IS LISTED FOR CLEARING THE SEVERAL DEFECTS THAT ARE OCCUR DURING FILING OF SLP BEFORE HONORABLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AND THE DIARY NUMBER OF THIS CASE IS 29416 OF 2015. | Disposed Off | December 16,2015 | Delay condoned.
The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | PIYUSH HANS | ADMN/UE001/SC-DELHI/2015/00219 |
43
| SLP | 34264 | 2017 | September 21, 2017 | HUDA VS. IQBAL HUSSAIN | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) DIARY NO(S). 34264/2017
(ARISING OUT OF IMPUGNED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 16-03-2017
IN RSA NO. 660/2017 PASSED BY THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH)
| Disposed Off | November 20, 2017 | Delay condoned.
The special leave petition is dismissed.
However, the impugned order passed by the High Court
shall not be treated as precedent for other cases. | No | | | Faridabad | No | Yes | Alok Sanghwan | EO/UE001/SC-DELHI/2017/0066 |
44
| SLP | 33890 | 2016 | February 09, 2018 | AJAY MITTAL THROUGH GPA ASHA GROVER VS. HUDA & ORS. | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | POSSESSION MATTER | Disposed Off | December 07, 2018 | Learned counsel for the petitioner says that he is
ready and willing to make the payment at the allotment
rate of Rs.6200 per sq. m. after adjusting any amount
that has already been paid.
We direct accordingly.
The balance amount be paid within a period of four
weeks from today.
The special leave petitions stand disposed of in view
of the above. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | ANIL GROVER | EO/UE001/SC-DELHI/2018/002 |
45
| SLP | 24472 | 2018 | March 16, 2018 | HUDA VS. SUMER SINGH | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | SERVICE MATTER OF PROMOTION FROM SUPERVISOR HORTICULTURE TO JE. | Disposed Off | July 30, 2018 | DISMISSED ON 30.07.2018 | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | HEMANT GUPTA | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2018/003 |
46
| SLP | 18361 | 2014 | June 17,2015 | ANANGPAL AND ANR VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | MATTER OF THIS CASE IS CONNECTED WITH SLP NO.15369 OF 2014 TITLED AS ASJIT SINGH CHAWLA & ORS. VS STATE OF HARYANA . | Disposed Off | November 21,2014 | No plausible explanation has been given for the delay of 567 days. Consequently, the Special Leave Petition is dismissed on the ground of delay | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | Alok Sanghwan | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2015/0061 |
47
| SLP (C) | 15302 | 2014 | June 23,2015 | SURINGDER KUMARAND OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTEHRS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | MISCELLANEOUS | Disposed Off | January 31, 2018 | case disposed off order is awaiting | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | B.K SATIJA ADVOCATE | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2015/0062 |
48
| WP | 1037 | 2014 | June 17,2015 | SALMA NASEEM VS. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | July 15,2015 | The impugned awards of the learned court below are modified
to the extent mentioned above and the appeals and cross objections filed by
the landowners as well as the appeals filed by the State are disposed of
accordingly | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | ANIL GROVER | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2015/0063 |
49
| SLP | 6453 | 2018 | April 19, 2018 | M/S KAMBOJ LABORATORIES & ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | RESUMPTION OF PLOT ON ACCOUNT OF NON CONSTRUCTION | Disposed Off | March 05, 2019 | We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. However, the question of law is kept open. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, is/are disposed of. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2018/004 |
50
| SLP | 8938 | 2018 | May 16, 2018 | HUDA VS. SURENDER KUMAR | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | DIARY NO. 8938 OF 2018 (SERVICE MATTER) | Disposed Off | May 16, 2018 | Delay condoned.
The special leave petition is dismissed.
Pending application, if any, is disposed of.
| No | | | Faridabad | No | No | B.K SATIJA ADVOCATE | EO/UE001/SC-DELHI/2018/007 |
51
| SLP | 18641 | 2018 | August 07, 2018 | STATE OF HARYANA VS. DIPTYMAL & ORS. | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER. | Disposed Off | December 12, 2018 | PENDING | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | ADA FARIDABAD | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2018/00101 |
52
| DIARY | 42913 | 2018 | August 09, 2018 | HSVP VS. M/S AUTO DOOR SYSTEMS INDIA PVT. LTD. | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | SLP HAS BEEN FILED AGAINST THE ORDER DT. 13.07.2018 PASSED BY HIGH COURT IN RA NO. 130/2018 IN CWP NO. 26244/2014. | Disposed Off | January 03, 2019 | Delay condoned.
The grievance in the present petition is limited to
clarifying the order passed by the High Court. According to the
learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the review petition
was filed by the petitioner only for that limited purpose but which
aspect has not been touched in the impugned order.
Be that as it may, we permit the petitioner to file a
fresh application, before the High court, for clarification of
order dated 6.11.2017, if so advised.
The High Court may decide the said application, if filed,
in accordance with law.
The special leave petitions stand disposed of
accordingly.
Pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | Alok Sanghwan | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2018/008 |
53
| SLP | 18325 | 2018 | August 24, 2018 | ANIL KUMAR SETHI VS. ROMESH KUMAR SETHI AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | MISCELLANEOUS | Disposed Off | August 20, 2019 | It is further agreed that any proceedings
pending against each other will stand withdrawn.
There is, however, some issue of the old documents
of respondent No. 2 (for which FIR is registered)
which according to the said respondent are still in
the custody of the petitioner, while the petitioner
states that if at all, the said documents would be
lying in the portion for which keys have been handed
over. This is the matter which the parties will
have to resolve themselves.
Pending applications stand disposed of. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | Alok Sanghwan | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2018/0010 |
54
| SLP | 22431 | 2015 | September 30,2015 | JAI NARAIN VS. SATPAL AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER | Disposed Off | February 12,2016 | We do not find any merit in this petition. The
special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
| | | January 18,2016 | Faridabad | No | No | RAKESH MUDGAL | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2015/0065 |
55
| SLP | 29574 | 2015 | September 24,2015 | STATE OF HARYANA VS. SHAMSHER SINGH MALIK AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | DR. MONIKA GOSAIN IS THE HUDA COUNSEL IN THIS CASE. | Disposed Off | November 20,2015 | Learned counsel for the petitioners submits
that matters arising out of the same impugned
judgment and order are dismissed. The statement
made at the Bar is taken on record. The special
leave petitions are dismissed accordingly | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2015/0066 |
56
| SLP | 27340 | 2015 | November 9,2015 | SHER SINGH AND ANOTHER VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER | Disposed Off | September 28,2015 | We however make it clear that this order shall not prevent the petitioners from seeking such redress before the competent authority for grant of any rehabilitation benefit under any prevalent scheme as may be permissible in law. In case any such request for claim is made, the competent authority is free to examine the same in terms of the Scheme and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. We make it further clear that this order shall not prevent the petitioners from claiming enhancement of compensation by way of a reference before a civil court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. In case a reference application is filed by the petitioners within a period of six weeks from today, the same shall be treated to have been filed within the period of limitation and disposed off accordingly. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | - | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2015/0069 |
57
| SLP (CC) | 13164 | 2016 | December 28,2015 | HUDA VS. SANJEEV DHAWAN AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | - | Disposed Off | July 22,2016 | Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the special leave petition to approach the High Court seeking review of the impugned judgment and order. Submission made is placed on record. Accordingly, the special leave petition is dismissed as withdrawn. | | | | Faridabad | No | No | ANIRUDDHA RAJPUT | ADMN/UE001/SC-DELHI/2015/00220 |
58
| SLP | 14039 | 2015 | November 23,2015 | PARDEEP MEHRA VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | FOR ALLOTMENT OF PLOT | Disposed Off | August 10, 2017 | Heard.
Delay condoned.
The special leave petition is dismissed.
Pending applications, if any, are also stand disposed of. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | B.C. BHATT, ADVOCATE | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2015/00216 |
59
| SLP (CC) | 11704 | 2016 | November 6,2015 | HUDA VS.SHARAD SOOD | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | INTEREST OTHERS | Disposed Off | July 8,2016 | dismissed as withdrawn | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | B K SATIJA | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2015/0073 |
60
| SLP | 31454 | 2015 | December 16,2015 | STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS VS. DHARAMVEER AND ANOTHER | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER | Disposed Off | February 12, 2018 | case dismissed on 12.02.2018 | | | | Faridabad | | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2015/0074 |
61
| SLP | 13165 | 2016 | December 7,2015 | STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS VS. KAMAL KUMAR | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER | Disposed Off | July 22,2016 | Delay condoned.
We find no good reason to interfere with the
Impugned Order, the Special Leave Petition is accordingly
dismissed .
Interlocutory Applications, if any, shall stand
disposed of. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | B.K SATIJA ADVOCATE | EO/UE001/SC-DELHI/2015/00217 |
62
| SLP | 31486 | 2015 | January 12,2016 | STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERSVS. KUNDAN & GHASI OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER | Disposed Off | February 17,2017 | | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | MANIK GARG | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/001 |
63
| SLP | 33884 | 2015 | December 15,2015 | MANJU MANGLA VS. HUDA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | RESUMPTION OF PLOT | Disposed Off | February 23,2017 | Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are inclined
to hold that such a direction by the National Commission was not
necessary and accordingly it is set aside.
The special leave petitions are accordingly disposed of.
No order as to costs. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | B K SATIJA | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2015/00215 |
64
| SLP | 26908 | 2015 | January 27,2016 | SURINDER KUMAR GUPTA VS. HUDA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | October 30,2015 | DISPOSED OF | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | DEEPAK MANCHANDA | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/002 |
65
| SLP | 7682 | 2016 | February 11,2016 | HUDA VS. M/S CHOPRA ENGINEERING PVT LTD | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | April 1,2016 | We find no infirmity in the order impugned herein. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | SHEKHAR RAJ SHARMA | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/003 |
66
| SLP | 7627 | 2014 | June 30, 2014 | HUDA & ANR. VS. VIRI RAJ | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | June 30, 2014 | Delay condoned.
The special leave petition is dismissed.
| No | | | Faridabad | No | No | ANUBHA AGRAWAL | EO/UE001/SC-DELHI/2014/00153 |
67
| SLP | 8208 | 2016 | March 9,2016 | HUDA FARIDABAD VS. M/S CHOPTA ENGINNERS PVT, LTD | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | - | Disposed Off | April 1,2016 | DISMISSED | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/004 |
68
| SLP | 5513 | 2016 | April 4,2016 | BUDH RAM AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER | Disposed Off | November 16,2015 | DISPOSED OF | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/006 |
69
| SLP | 2199 | 2016 | April 27,2016 | ASHOK KUMAR VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER | Disposed Off | December 06, 2017 | With the aforesaid observations and
directions, all the appeals are allowed. The
impugned judgments and orders of the High Court are
set aside and the matters are remanded to the High
Court for fresh disposal in accordance with the
directions and observations contained in the
present order. The High Court is requested to
decide the matters as expeditiously as its business
would permit. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/007 |
70
| SLP | 10042 | 2016 | May 27,2016 | VIPUL LTD AND ANOTHER VS. STATE OF HARYANA | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER | Disposed Off | December 06, 2017 | With the aforesaid observations and
directions, all the appeals are allowed. The
impugned judgments and orders of the High Court are
set aside and the matters are remanded to the High
Court for fresh disposal in accordance with the
directions and observations contained in the
present order. The High Court is requested to
decide the matters as expeditiously as its business
would permit. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | A.G. OFFICE | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/009 |
71
| SLP | 00 | 2016 | July 8,2016 | STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS VS. KARAN SINGH | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | - | Disposed Off | January 8,2016 | DISPOSED OF | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0011 |
72
| SLP | 007335 | 2019 | March 11, 2019 | HUDA VS. M/S INDICATION INSTRUMENTS LTD. | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | REJECTION OF APPLICATION OF THE PLAINTIFF BEING NOT ELIGIBLE TO THE ALLOTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL PLOT.
| Disposed Off | March 11, 2019 | Delay condoned.
We see no reason to interfere with the impugned order
passed by the High Court. The special leave petition is,
accordingly, dismissed.
Pending application shall also stand disposed of. | | | | Faridabad | No | No | Alok Sanghwan | EO/UE001/SC-DELHI/2019/001 |
73
| SLP | 5138 | 2019 | February 25, 2019 | HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. SHREE NARAYANA GURU SAMAJAM (REGD.) | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | POSSESSION WAS NOT GIVEN DUE TO NON PAYMENT OF INTEREST.
| Disposed Off | February 25, 2019 | We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order
passed by the High Court. The Special Leave Petition is,
accordingly, dismissed.
Pending interlocutory application, if any, is are disposed
of. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | ANIL GROVER | EO/UE001/SC-DELHI/2019/002 |
74
| SLP | 4441 | 2019 | March 25, 2019 | RAM SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | THE OFFICE REPORT INDICATES THAT SERVICE OF NOTICE IS COMPLETE
UPON BOTH THE RESPONDENTS BUT NO ONE HAS ENTERED APPEARANCE ON
THEIR BEHALF. HOWEVER, TODAY, DR.MONIKA GUSAIN,AOR UNDERTAKES TO
APPEAR FOR THE ABOVE RESPONDENTS. SHE SEEKS AND IS GIVEN TWO
WEEK’S TIME TO FILE VAKALATNAMA AND FOUR WEEK’S TIME TO FILE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT.
LIST THE MATTER AGAIN ON 06.08.2019. | Disposed off | November 22, 2022 | Disposed off. | | | | Faridabad | | Not Filled | - | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2019/006 |
75
| SLP | 739 | 2013 | January 25,2013 | RAJ SINGH AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | SLP NO. 740 OF 2013 ALSO RELATES TO THIS CASE. | Disposed Off | March 5,2013 | disposed of | | | | Faridabad | No | No | GOBIND GOYAL | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/005 |
76
| SLP | 38830 | 2013 | January 31,2013 | HUDA VS. LALIT KUMAR | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | I.A. 2/2014 IN PETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO(S).
38830/2013
(ARISING OUT OF IMPUGNED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 11/01/2006
IN LPA NO. 269/2000 PASSED BY THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH) | Disposed Off | September 2,2015 | Learned counsel on both sides would state that
the issues raised in these special leave petitions
are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in
the case of Ashrafi & Ors. vs. State of Haryana &
Ors., reported in (2013) 5 SCC 527.
Following the aforesaid decision, these
special leave petitions are also disposed of in the
same terms, observations, conditions and directions. | | | | Faridabad | No | No | ANUBHA AGRAWAL | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0046 |
77
| CA | 8581 | 2013 | January 23,2013 | GULAB SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | RESUMPTION OTHERS | Disposed Off | December 16,2014 | disposed of | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | ANUBHA AGRAWAL | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/007 |
78
| SLP | 0000 | 2013 | February 18,2013 | HUDA VS. AMITA JAIN( WRONG ENTRY) | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | AS PER THE INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM ESTATE OFFICE VIDE MEMO NO. 379 DATED 29.04.2015 THIS CASE WAS NOT FILED. | Disposed Off | April 29,2015 | | | | | Faridabad | No | No | ANUBHA AGRAWAL | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/009 |
79
| SLP | 16008 | 2013 | March 8,2013 | VEDVRIT VS. HUDA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | July 12,2016 | DISPOSED OF | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | GOBIND GOYAL | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0010 |
80
| SLP | 1157 | 2013 | March 13,2013 | KRISHANA DEVI AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTERS | Disposed Off | March 6,2014 | DISPOSED OF | | | | Faridabad | No | No | ANUBHA AGRAWAL | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0012 |
81
| SLP | 9853 | 2013 | March 18,2013 | KHAZAN SINGH VS. HUDA | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | March 6,2014 | Please see the final order in the interim order detail column as the space provided in this column is very less. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | GOBIND GOYAL | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0014 |
82
| SLP | 0000000 | 2013 | April 8,2013 | HUDA VS. RAO NIHAL (WRONG ENTRY)SINGH | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | April 29,2015 | PENDING | | | | Faridabad | No | No | ANUBHA AGRAWAL | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0016 |
83
| SLP | 16012 | 2013 | February 1,2013 | JOGINDER SINGH JANGU VS. HUDA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | July 12,2016 | DISPOSED OF | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | GOBIND GOYAL | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0020 |
84
| SLP | 10119 | 2013 | April 30,2013 | BAL KISHAN AND OTHERS VS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | CONNECTED WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.290 OF 2015 (THIS APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF VIDE ORDER DATED 08.1.2015 | Disposed Off | January 8,2015 | Having heard all the learned counsel, we
are persuaded to dispose of these proceedings,
without entering on the merits, by granting liberty
to the land owners before us to pray for the revival
of the Appeal in the event that Orders under Section
24 of 2013 are adverse to their interest. We,
therefore, permit the land owners to initiate
appropriate proceedings in the proper forum/court,seeking the benefit of Section 24 of the 2013 Act,
within eight weeks from today. In the event that
any land owners have already approached the High
Court concerned, their plea under Section 24 of the
2013 Act shall be decided on merits.Interim protection, if already granted, shall
continue for a period of 90 days from today.
| | | | Faridabad | No | No | GOBIND GOYAL | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0021 |
85
| CA | 628 | 2013 | April 18,2013 | LAL CHAND VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | CIVIL APPEAL NO. 629 OF 2013 IN SLP NO. 15848-15849 OF 2011 | Disposed Off | January 22,2013 | Having heard learned counsel for the applicant and the
Official Liquidator and keeping in view the fact that in similar matters
delay has already been condoned, this application is allowed and the
Official Liquidator is directed to pay the dividend amount due to the
applicant, within a period of one month, subject to compliance of the
statutory obligations.
CA stands disposed of.
| | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0023 |
86
| SLP | 16882 | 2016 | May 13,2016 | KISHAN SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER ARISING OUT OF RFA NO 1072 OF 2001, PERTAINS TO VILLAGE AJRONDA SECTOR-20-A&B | Disposed Off | March 11, 2019 | DISPOSED | | | | Faridabad | No | No | - | ADMN/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0012 |
87
| SLP | 16884 | 2016 | July 12,2016 | JEET SINGH (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS & ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER PERTAINS TO VILLAGE AJRONDA, FARIDABAD | Disposed Off | March 11, 2019 | DISPOSED | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | - | ADMN/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0013 |
88
| SLP | 15568 | 2016 | July 9,2016 | RAGHBIR SINGH AND ORS. VS. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR. | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER PERTAINS TO VILLAGE AJRONDA | Disposed Off | March 11, 2019 | DISPOSED | | | | Faridabad | No | No | - | ADMN/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0014 |
89
| SLP | 15255 | 2016 | July 12,2016 | SATISH KUMAR & ORS. VS. STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER PERTAINS TO VILLAGE AJRONDA, SECTOR-20 A & B | Disposed Off | March 11, 2019 | PENDING | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | - | ADMN/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0015 |
90
| SLP | 16886 | 2016 | July 11,2016 | VIJAY PAL AND ORS. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER PERTAINS TO VILLAGE AJRONDA | Disposed Off | March 11, 2019 | DISPOSED | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | - | ADMN/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0016 |
91
| SLP | 15270 | 2016 | July 9,2016 | VIJAY MALIK AND ORS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER | Disposed Off | March 11, 2019 | | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | - | ADMN/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0017 |
92
| CA | 1112 | 2015 | August 8,2016 | INDU BALA SATIJA VS. VIKAS GUPTA AND ANOTHER | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | SURRENDER OF ALLOTMENT BY THE ALLOTTEE | Disposed Off | January 21,2015 | HUDA could have forfeited only 10% of the original price as notified to the applicant, that is, 10% of Rs.4,66,250/-. However, HUDA has forfeited an amount of Rs.82,590/- based on the enhance price. Accordingly, since we have held that HUDA could not have forfeited 10% of the enhanced amount, HUDA is liable to refund to the appellant an amount of Rs.35,965/-, which is still lying with HUDA. This amount, in our opinion, has unreasonably been withheld by HUDA and we, therefore, direct HUDA to refund this amount, viz., Rs.35,965/- to the appellant within a period of one month from today along with interest at the rate of 9% per annum with effect from 25th March, 2003, that is the date on which the surrender application was accepted We make it clear that the order passed by the National Commission imposing cost of Rs.10,000/- on the appellant is set aside. The appeal is disposed of on the above terms. However, there shall be no order as to costs | Yes | January 19,2016 | | Faridabad | No | Yes | ANIL GROVER | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0018 |
93
| COCP | 392 | 2016 | August 8,2016 | INDU BALA SATIJA VS. VIKAS GUPTA AND ANOTHER | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | SURRENDER OF ALLOTMENT BY THE ALLOTTEE | Disposed Off | November 11,2016 | The contempt petition is disposed of in view of the fact
that the payment has been paid. We impose costs of ? 10,000/-
(Rupees ten thousand only) on the respondents for the delay
which should be paid to the petitioner within a period of two
weeks from today.
The question of additional interest raised by the
petitioner is taken care of through the imposition of costs.The contempt petition is disposed of in terms of the signed
order.
| No | | August 29,2016 | Faridabad | No | Yes | ANIL GROVER | EO/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0019 |
94
| SLP (C) | 3943 | 2018 | July 25, 2019 | MAHARAJ SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | RESUMPTION DUE TO NON CONSTRUCTION | Disposed Off | October 04, 2018 | Delay condoned.
We have gone through the review petition and considered the grounds raised in support thereof. In our
considered view, there is no error apparent on the face of record calling for intervention in review jurisdiction.Accordingly, the review petition stands dismissed. | | | | Faridabad | | Not Filled | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2019/007 |
95
| SLP | 9770 | 2019 | August 13, 2019 | STATE OF HARYANA VS DALMIA BHARAT SUGAR AND INDUSTRIES | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, THOUGH WE DO NOT SEE ANY REASON TO
INTERFERE IN THE MATTER, WE REQUEST THE HIGH COURT TO TAKE UP THE
MATTER AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE.
THE SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION IS, ACCORDINGLY, DISMISSED.
PENDING APPLICATION(S), IF ANY, SHALL STAND DISPOSED OF. | Disposed off | April 26, 2019 | Disposed off. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | - | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2019/009 |
96
| SLP | 17073 | 2013 | June 25,2013 | CL EDUCATE LTD. VS. HUDA | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | MATTER OF THIS CASE IS CONNECTED TO SLP (CIVIL) 35748-35749 OF 2012 TITLED AS BAREJA AUTO MOBILES PVT. LTD. VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. | Pending | May 15, 2024 | Sole appellant is not served with notice of alternative
arrangement. Since the appellant is unrepresented, the matter be
processed for listing before the Hon’ble Judge in Chambers.
| | | | Faridabad | No | Not Filled | Arun Bhardwaj | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0024 |
97
| SLP | 13477 | 2013 | June 26,2013 | RAJ SINGH AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | March 6,2014 | disposed of
copy of the order not available on supreme court website | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | GOBIND GOYAL | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0026 |
98
| SLP | 18435 | 2013 | July 17,2013 | PANKAJ AGGARWAL VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | May 8,2013 | disposed of | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | - | EO/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0077 |
99
| SLP | 16007 | 2013 | June 7,2013 | HUDA AND OTHERS VS. MOHINDER SINGH | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | REGARDING ALLOTMENT OF PLOT UNDER DEFENCE QUOTA AND MATTER OF THIS CASE IS CONNECTED TO SLP (CIVIL) 4785-4786 OF 2013 TITLED AS HUDA & OTHER VS CHANDER BHAN SHARMA & ANR. | Disposed Off | July 12,2016 | no ground for interference is mande out in exercise of over jurisdiction under artical 136 of constution of India. The SLP are accordincly dismissed | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | Arun Bhardwaj | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0028 |
100
| SLP | 18555 | 2013 | July 31,2013 | VIDYA DEVI AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | July 3,2013 | We have carefully perused the record. Though, the order under challenge is laconic inasmuch as it does not contain reasons for rejection of the application for restoration but having carefully perused the order by which the writ petition was dismissed, we are satisfied that the petitioners had been thoroughly negligent in prosecuting the cause before the High Court. The High Court had given time to the petitioners as early as on 31.05.2005 to place on record copy of jamabandi indicating/describing status of the property. For next 7 years, the petitioners did not take steps to place on record the necessary document. This left the High Court with no option but to dismiss the petition and we do not find any error in order dated 31.08.2012 which may justify inteference by this Court under Article 136 of the Constitution. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | A.G. Haryana | ADMN/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0078 |
101
| SLP | 20049 | 2013 | August 27,2013 | INDU BALA SATIJA VS. HUDA | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | November 25,2013 | DISPOSED OF | No | | August 14,2014 | Faridabad | No | No | Narinder Hooda | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0030 |
102
| CA | 3577 | 2013 | July 30,2013 | ANAND KUMAR VS. HUDA | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | October 21,2013 | :.............the total amount of the compensation alongwith all other benefits accruing from the subject lands in the present case, be credited directly into the bank account of the petitioner in the likewise manner as directed in the judgments of this Honble Court reported in (2010) 11 SCC 178 and (2012) 7 SCC 595. | No | | | Faridabad | Yes | Yes | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0031 |
103
| SLP | 25329 | 2013 | August 22,2013 | SHUKAL KUMAR JAIN ETC VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC CASE (CONNECTED WITH SLP NO.25329-336 OF 2013) | Disposed Off | January 4,2017 | It is stated by the learned counsel appearing for both the
parties that the issue involved in the instant appeals is covered
by the judgment of this Court in Ashrafi and Others Vs. State of
Haryana and Others 2013(5) SCC 527.
In the circumstances, the appeals are disposed of in terms of
the aforesaid judgment. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | DEVINDER SAINI | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0032 |
104
| SLP | 000000000 | 2013 | September 11,2013 | HUDA VS. HYDERABAD INDUSTRIES FARIDABAD (DEC MATTER) | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | June 8,2016 | SLP not filed till date 08.06.2016 as per Supreme Court website | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | Narinder Hooda | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0033 |
105
| SLP | 27088 | 2013 | September 18,2013 | M/S MALANI INTERNATIONAL VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC OTHERS | Disposed Off | November 12,2014 | disposed of | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | Narinder Hooda | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0035 |
106
| SLP | 001 | 2013 | November 14,2013 | HUDA VS. NEELAM SANTORIYA | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | December 19,2013 | DISPOSED OF | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | ANUBHA AGRAWAL | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0040 |
107
| SLP | 31470 | 2013 | November 12,2013 | KRISHAL LAL GERA VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | ARISING OUT OF SLP NO.15584 OF 2013 | Disposed Off | September 23,2013 | disposed of | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0041 |
108
| SLP | 19073 | 2013 | January 21,2014 | RAM KARAAN VS. STATE OF HARYANA | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | - | Disposed Off | July 5,2013 | In our opinion, the High Courts refusal to give priroity to the appeal of the petitioner does not suffer from any infirmity requiring interference by this Court under Article 136 of the Constitution. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. It is needless to say that the petitioner shall be free to make a representation to Honble the Chief Justice of the High Court for early hearing of his case | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2014/001 |
109
| SLP | 30067 | 2013 | October 7,2013 | PARTAP SINGH YADAV VS. HUDA AND ANOTHER | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | THAT THE OWNER OF PLOT NO.2342,,SECTOR-2,F ARIDABAD REQUESTEDF OR SURRENDER OF HIS PLOT DUE TO NON-PAYMENT OF ENHANCEMENT AND INSTALLMENTS IN-TIME WHICH WAS ACCEPTED BY E.O., FARIDABAD. HE FILED A CONSUMER COMPLAINT BEARING NO.380 OF 2005 BEFORE THE DCF FARIDABAD TO PAY INTEREST OR 10% DEDUCTED AMOUNT ALONGWITH INTEREST OR TO RESTORE THE PLOT IN HIS FAVOUR AS THE SAME WAS REFUNDED TO HIM AS PER HUDA POLICY. FURTHER AS PER ORDERS DATED 26.10.2005 OF DCF FARIDABAD HUDA WAS DIRECTED TO RE-ALLOT THE SAID PLOTTO THE APPLICANT ON SIMILAR PRICE AND IF THE SAME IS NOT FOUND TO BE VACANT/UN-ALLOTTED, THEN ANOTHER PLOT BE ALLOTTED TO THE APPLICANT, PAY 12% P.A. INTEREST ON THE AMOUNT DEPOSITED BY THE APPLICANT W.E.F. ITS DEDUCTION TILL THE ADJUSTMENT OF THE SAID PLOT AND ALSO TO PAY RS.50000/-&RS. 5000/- ON ACCOUNT OF MENTAL AGONY AS WELL AS COST OF LITIGATION RESPECTIVELY. | Disposed Off | October 28,2016 | We accordingly allow these appeals but only in part and to the extent indicated above and set aside the order passed by the National Commission and the State Commission with the direction that subject to the appellant depositing the price of the plot at the rate of Rs.18,000/- per square meters within a period of six months from today the appellant shall be permitted to retain the plot. In case the needful is not done within the time allowed, this appeal shall stand dismissed and order passed by National Commission and the State Commission affirmed. In any such event HUDA shall be free to dispossess the appellant from the property and resume the possession of the plot along with the superstructure, in case the superstructure is not removed by the appellants within the time granted by HUDA for that purpose | No | | January 6,2015 | Faridabad | No | No | Arun Bhardwaj | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0043 |
110
| WP | 320 | 2014 | February 21,2014 | KHORI GAON COLONY KALYAN SAMITI VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | April 25,2014 | disposed of | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2014/003 |
111
| SLP | 39181 | 2013 | March 6,2014 | AJIT SINGH ARORA VS. HUDA AND ANOTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | RESUMPTION OF BOOTH | Disposed Off | September 13, 2019 | disposed of | | | | Faridabad | No | No | Arun Bhardwaj | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2014/004 |
112
| SLP | 33838 | 2013 | December 20,2013 | KRISHAN LAL GERA VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | October 18,2013 | DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0044 |
113
| SLP | 34560 | 2013 | December 20,2013 | MAYUR VIHAR RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | July 29,2013 | Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this
Special Leave Petition.
Permission is granted.
The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
However, looking at the facts of the case, liberty is granted to the
petitioner to make a representation to the State on the subject matter of
this Special Leave Petition. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0045 |
114
| SLP | 13036 | 2014 | April 16,2014 | HUDA VS. SUNRISE ENGINEERING | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | May 21,2015 | The Special Leave petition is dismissed. | | | | Faridabad | No | No | ANUBHA AGRAWAL | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2014/008 |
115
| SLP | 13424 | 2016 | August 1,2016 | BHUNESH CHAND VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC | Disposed Off | March 28,2016 | DISPOSED OF | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0021 |
116
| CA | 290 | 2015 | August 18,2016 | BAL KISHAN VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC | Disposed Off | January 8,2015 | It is in these circumstances, that all the appeals are disposed of with liberty to the parties to revive these Appeals in the event that the Orders under Section 24 of the 2013 Act are seen as adverse to their interest. Interim protection, if already granted, shall continue for a period of 90 days from today. It is further clarified that the parties desirous of reviving the Appeal must approach this Court within 90 days of the accruel of the High Court s orders. The Appeals stand disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. Counsel for the parties submitted that the present
Appeal may also be disposed of with the aforesaid
observations and directions.
Ordered accordingly | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | AJAY BANSAL | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0022 |
117
| SLP | 17516 | 2016 | August 1,2016 | KARAMBIR SINGH AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC | Disposed Off | November 23, 2017 | DISPOSED (Motion Hearing
[AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES]) Leave Granted & Allowed-Ord dt:23/11/2017 (Disposal Date: 23-11-2017, Month: 11, Year: 2017)
JUDGES: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA, HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0024 |
118
| SLP | 9875 | 2016 | August 3,2016 | SUDERSHAN KUMAR WADHWA AND ANOTHER VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | ARISING OUT OF JUDGEMENT DATED 20.10.2015 IN CWP NO. 27319 OF 2013 (RELEASE OF LAND)
CHALLENGE IN THE PRESENT WRIT PETITION IS TO THE NOTIFICATION DATED
14.8.2008 PUBLISHED UNDER SECTION 4 READ WITH SECTION 17 OF THE LAND
ACQUISITION ACT, 1895 (HEREINAFTER MENTIONED AS THE ACT), FOLLOWED BY A
NOTIFICATION DATED 30.8.2008 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 6 OF THE ACT. | Disposed Off | January 28, 2019 | Leave granted.
The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order.
Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0025 |
119
| SLP | 17167 | 2016 | August 1,2016 | RAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER | Disposed Off | November 17, 2017 | DISPOSED (Motion Hearing
[AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES]) Leave Granted & Allowed-Ord dt:17/11/2017 (Disposal Date: 17-11-2017, Month: 1, Year: 2018)
JUDGES: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA, HONBLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | A.G. OFFICE | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0026 |
120
| SLP | 15098 | 2016 | August 8,2016 | BALWANT SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER | Disposed Off | March 11, 2019 | Hon’ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao pronounced the NonReportable Judgment of the Bench comprising His Lordship and Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah. Leave granted. The appeals are disposed of in terms of the Signed Nonreportable judgment. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. | | | | Faridabad | No | No | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0027 |
121
| SLP | 16425 | 2016 | August 12,2016 | STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS VS. CHANDGI RAM | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER (PENDING - (FINAL HEARING) JUDGEMENT RESERVED ON 13-12-2017) | Disposed Off | February 16, 2018 | Leave Granted & Allowed | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0028 |
122
| SLP | 15266 | 2016 | August 12,2016 | M/S BHANOT BROTHERS VS. HUDA AND ANOTHER | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER | Disposed Off | July 1,2016 | No ground for interference is made out to exercise our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The special leave petition is dismissed. However, it is open for the respondent - Haryana Urban Development Authority to consider the petitioners application, if it is permissible in law. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. | No | | | Faridabad | No | Yes | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0029 |
123
| SLP (C) | 968 | 2017 | August 12,2016 | HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND VS. SANJAY BHAMBRI AND ANR | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | - | Disposed Off | January 20,2017 | Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
Delay condoned.
We do not find any reason to entertain this
special leave petition.
The special leave petition is, accordingly,
dismissed. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0030 |
124
| CP | 392 | 2016 | August 8,2016 | INDU BALA SATIJA VS. VIKAS GUPTA AND ANOTHER (WRONG ENTRY) | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | SURRENDER OF ALLOTMENT BY THE ALLOTTEE | Disposed Off | August 29,2016 | DISPOSED OF | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | ANIL GROVER | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0031 |
125
| SLP | 16438 | 2016 | September 8,2016 | STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS VS. MAYA RAM (D) THEIR LRS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER (JUDGEMENT RESERVED ON 13.12.2017) | Disposed Off | February 16, 2018 | DISPOSED of on 16.02.2018 | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0032 |
126
| SLP (CC) | 15054 | 2016 | August 17,2016 | SANJAY KUMAR AND ORS. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | August 17,2016 | Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw application for permission to file special leave petition as also the special leave petition with a liberty to approach the appropriate authorities. Leave and liberty granted. The special leave petition as also application(s) are dismissed as withdrawn | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | - | EO/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0033 |
127
| SLP | 25453 | 2016 | November 3,2016 | BHAGWAN DASS BY LRS. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER | Disposed Off | November 02, 2017 | Hence, in our considered opinion, instead of 40%, 15%
deduction would be appropriate; rest of the Award is not
disturbed. The payment be made as early as possible within
four months.
The appeals are allowed to the aforesaid extent. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/00101 |
128
| SLP | 4086 | 2016 | November 3,2016 | VINOD KUMAR AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER | Disposed Off | December 06, 2017 | With the aforesaid observations and
directions, all the appeals are allowed. The
impugned judgments and orders of the High Court are
set aside and the matters are remanded to the High
Court for fresh disposal in accordance with the
directions and observations contained in the
present order. The High Court is requested to
decide the matters as expeditiously as its business
would permit. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/00102 |
129
| SLP | 33329 | 2016 | October 17,2016 | WINSOFT TECHNOLOGIES (AN EDUCATIONAL TR VS. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | ALLOTMENT OF SCHOOL SITE IN SECTOR-28, FARIDABAD | Disposed Off | March 6,2017 | No case for interference in the impugned order is
made out. Special leave petition is dismissed.
Interlocutory Applications, if any, shall stand
disposed of. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | Arun Bhardwaj | EO/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/00103 |
130
| SLP | 33550 | 2016 | November 17,2016 | SOM PAL AND ORS. ETC. ETC. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | November 02, 2017 | The appeals are allowed to the extent indicated in
the signed order.
Pending application, if any shall stand disposed of. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | - | EO/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/00104 |
131
| SLP | 31050 | 2016 | October 4,2016 | RAJIV VOHRA VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | RESUMPTION DUE TO NON-PAYMENT.
| Disposed Off | February 21, 2019 | During the pendency of the proceedings in this Court, the appellant deposited an amount of Rs 20 lakhs before the Registry of this Court pursuant to the interim order. The third respondent is at liberty to withdraw the amount deposited by the appellant with accrued interest towards charges for unauthorized occupation. The third respondent shall compute occupation charges of the booth from 6 May 1996 and adjust the dues for occupation from the amount deposited by the appellant within two months of this order. Any surplus that remains shall be returned to the appellant with interest at the rate of 6% per annum. If the amount determined by the third respondent is in excess of the above amount deposited by the appellant, the third respondent will be at liberty to file appropriate proceedings for recovery. 16 The appeal is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. There shall be no order as to costs | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | Arun Bhardwaj | EO/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/00105 |
132
| SLP | 33137 | 2013 | December 18,2013 | VIKAS KUMAR GUPTA VS. FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER AND P.SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF HARYANA | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | November 1,2013 | We have heard Shri Satya Mitra Garg, learned counsel for the petitioner and carefully perused the record. In our view, the detailed reasons recorded by the Financial Commissioner and the High Court for not entertaining the petitioners prayer for compounding are legally sound and the order under challenge does not call for interference under Article 136 of the Constitution. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. A copy of this order be sent to Chief Administrator, HUDA, Panchkula by fax. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | ADMN/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0079 |
133
| SLP | 12865 | 2014 | July 15,2014 | RAJ KUMAR AND ANR VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | RESUMPTION DUE TO NON PAYMENT
CONNECTED WITH SLP NO.12865-66.THIS CASE IS LINKED WITH SLP (CIVIL) CC 1981,1982 OF 2014. | Disposed Off | September 27,2016 | No ground for interference is made out to exercise our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The special leave petitions are dismissed accordingly. The amount deposited by the petitioners in this Registry may be refunded to them along with interest accrued, if any. Respondent-authority is also directed to refund the amount deposited by the petitioners, if any, except the forfeited amount. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | B K SATIJA | ADMN/UE001/SC-DELHI/2014/00152 |
134
| CA | 3337 | 2014 | July 14,2014 | HUDA VS. MOHAR SINGH AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | March 7,2014 | DISPOSED OF | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | ANUBHA AGRAWAL | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2014/0012 |
135
| SLP | 11456 | 2014 | July 9,2014 | DHANPAL SINGH (D) TH. LRS. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | | Disposed Off | April 17,2014 | DISPOSED OF | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2014/0013 |
136
| SLP | 30498 | 2014 | July 14,2014 | HUDA VS. DHARAMVEER | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | THE CASE IS LINKED WITH SLP (CIVIL) 29967 OF 2014 TITLED AS HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS KUNDAN @ GHASI AND ORS . | Disposed Off | February 17,2017 | | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | ANUBHA AGRAWAL | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2014/0014 |
137
| SLP | 33589 | 2016 | December 21,2016 | ROHTASH KUMAR AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER | Disposed Off | December 06, 2017 | DISPOSED (Motion Hearing
[AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES]) Leave Granted & Allowed-Ord dt:02/11/2017 (Disposal Date: 02-11-2017, Month: 11, Year: 2017)
JUDGES: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA, HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR (order not available) | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | - | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/00184 |
138
| DIARY | 15241 | 2017 | December 28,2016 | HUDA VS. ROHTASH KUMAR AND OTHERS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | POSESSION OF KHEWAT NO. 410, 448, 333 MIN (2-0) GAIR MUMKIN, SITUATED AT FARIDABAD | Disposed Off | March 14, 2019 | Dismissed | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | DILBAG SINGH | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/00185 |
139
| SLP | 1133 | 2017 | December 15,2016 | RAM SARUP AND ORS ETC VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR ETC | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER | Disposed Off | December 06, 2017 | With the aforesaid observations and directions, all the appeals are allowed. The impugned judgments and orders of the High Court are set aside and the matters are remanded to the High Court for fresh disposal in accordance with the directions and observations contained in the present order. The High Court is requested to decide the matters as expeditiously as its business would permit. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | - | ADMN/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/00188 |
140
| SLP | 23964 | 2017 | February 8,2017 | HUDA VS MANU GUPTA | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | ALLOTTEE FAILED TO MAKE THE PAYMENT OF DUE INSTALLMENTS IN TIME (DIARY
NO. 23964 OF 2017
) | Disposed Off | October 03, 2017 | Delay condoned.
We find no reason to entertain this special leave
petition, which is, accordingly, dismissed.
Pending application, if any, shall stand disposed of. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | Arun Bhardwaj | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2017/001 |
141
| SLP | 2904 | 2017 | May 20,2016 | PUNEET MOHLI AND ORS. ETC. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER | Disposed Off | December 06, 2017 | With the aforesaid observations and directions, all the appeals are allowed. The impugned judgments and orders of the High Court are set aside and the matters are remanded to the High Court for fresh disposal in accordance with the directions and observations contained in the present order. The High Court is requested to decide the matters as expeditiously as its business would permit. | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | - | ADMN/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/00189 |
142
| SLP | 37450 | 2016 | February 13,2017 | AMARCHAND VS STATE OF HARYANA | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | LAC MATTER | Disposed Off | September 05, 2017 | DISPOSED (Motion Hearing
[AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES]) Case Allowed-Ord dt:08/11/2017 (Disposal Date: 08-11-2017, Month: 11, Year: 2017)
JUDGES: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA, HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR (order not available on website) | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | - | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2017/002 |
143
| SLP | 3399 | 2017 | March 20,2017 | RAVI CHAND VS STATE OF HARYANA | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Faridabad | ENHANCED COMPENSTION MATTER | Disposed Off | September 05, 2017 | DISPOSED (Motion Hearing
[AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES]) Case Allowed-Ord dt:08/11/2017 (Disposal Date: 08-11-2017, Month: 11, Year: 2017)
JUDGES: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA, HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR (order not available on website.) | No | | | Faridabad | No | No | A.G. OFFICE | LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2017/0033 |
144
| SLP | 23559 | 2021 | 2021-09-29 00:00:00 | DEEPAK SHARMA vs. UNION OF INDIA | Supreme Court | Delhi | Faridabad | DEEPAK SHARMA vs. UNION OF INDIA | Disposed off | 2022-07-21 | | | | | Faridabad | | Not Filled | Chritarth Palli | 2284954 |