Summary Reports Page

These figures are tentative:

Final Direction Cases Of Supreme Court and High Court Since 2013 till : 05/12/2024

Sr No.	casetype	case_no	caseyear	case_date	case_title	court_name	court_location	urbanestate	case_description	decision	decision_date	decision_brief	appeal_filed	appeal_date	date_of_written_statement	ZoneName	complied_with	advocate_name	system_file_no
1	SLP	12072	2017	April 08, 2017	SANDEEP GIRDHER VS. STATE OF HARYANA	SUPREME COURT	DELHI	Faridabad	LAC MATTER	Disposed Off	July 31, 2017	dismissed	No			Faridabad	Yes	-	ADMN/UE001/SC-DELHI/2017/0062
2	SLP	21546	2017	November 16, 2017	BIRWATI CHOUDHARY AND ORS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS	SUPREME COURT	DELHI	Faridabad	LAND FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SECTOR 58 WAS ACQUIRED.(ARISING OUT IN CM NO. 10834-CWP OF 2017 IN CWP NO.10546/2016)	Disposed Off	August 20, 2018	Leave granted. The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed Reportable judgment. Pending applications shall also stand disposed of.	No			Faridabad	Yes	-	EO/UE001/SC-DELHI/2017/0065
3	SLP	33890	2016	February 09, 2018	AJAY MITTAL THROUGH GPA ASHA GROVER VS. HUDA & ORS.	SUPREME COURT	DELHI	Faridabad	POSSESSION MATTER	Disposed Off	December 07, 2018	Learned counsel for the petitioner says that he is ready and willing to make the payment at the allotment rate of Rs.6200 per sq. m. after adjusting any amount that has already been paid. We direct accordingly. The balance amount be paid within a period of four weeks from today. The special leave petitions stand disposed of in view of the above.	No			Faridabad	Yes	ANIL GROVER	EO/UE001/SC-DELHI/2018/002
4	CA	1112	2015	August 8,2016	INDU BALA SATIJA VS. VIKAS GUPTA AND ANOTHER	SUPREME COURT	DELHI	Faridabad	SURRENDER OF ALLOTMENT BY THE ALLOTTEE	Disposed Off	January 21,2015	HUDA could have forfeited only 10% of the original price as notified to the applicant, that is, 10% of Rs.4,66,250/-. However, HUDA has forfeited an amount of Rs.82,590/- based on the enhance price. Accordingly, since we have held that HUDA could not have forfeited 10% of the enhanced amount, HUDA is liable to refund to the appellant an amount of Rs.35,965/-, which is still lying with HUDA. This amount, in our opinion, has unreasonably been withheld by HUDA and we, therefore, direct HUDA to refund this amount, viz., Rs.35,965/- to the appellant within a period of one month from today along with interest at the rate of 9% per annum with effect from 25th March, 2003, that is the date on which the surrender application was accepted We make it clear that the order passed by the National Commission imposing cost of Rs.10,000/- on the appellant is set aside. The appeal is disposed of on the above terms. However, there shall be no order as to costs	Yes	January 19,2016		Faridabad	Yes	ANIL GROVER	LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0018
5	COCP	392	2016	August 8,2016	INDU BALA SATIJA VS. VIKAS GUPTA AND ANOTHER	SUPREME COURT	DELHI	Faridabad	SURRENDER OF ALLOTMENT BY THE ALLOTTEE	Disposed Off	November 11,2016	The contempt petition is disposed of in view of the fact that the payment has been paid. We impose costs of ? 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) on the respondents for the delay which should be paid to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today. The question of additional interest raised by the petitioner is taken care of through the imposition of costs.The contempt petition is disposed of in terms of the signed order.	No		August 29,2016	Faridabad	Yes	ANIL GROVER	EO/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0019
6	CA	3577	2013	July 30,2013	ANAND KUMAR VS. HUDA	SUPREME COURT	DELHI	Faridabad		Disposed Off	October 21,2013	:.............the total amount of the compensation alongwith all other benefits accruing from the subject lands in the present case, be credited directly into the bank account of the petitioner in the likewise manner as directed in the judgments of this Honble Court reported in (2010) 11 SCC 178 and (2012) 7 SCC 595.	No			Faridabad	Yes		LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0031
7	SLP	30067	2013	October 7,2013	PARTAP SINGH YADAV VS. HUDA AND ANOTHER	SUPREME COURT	DELHI	Faridabad	THAT THE OWNER OF PLOT NO.2342,,SECTOR-2,F ARIDABAD REQUESTEDF OR SURRENDER OF HIS PLOT DUE TO NON-PAYMENT OF ENHANCEMENT AND INSTALLMENTS IN-TIME WHICH WAS ACCEPTED BY E.O., FARIDABAD. HE FILED A CONSUMER COMPLAINT BEARING NO.380 OF 2005 BEFORE THE DCF FARIDABAD TO PAY INTEREST OR 10% DEDUCTED AMOUNT ALONGWITH INTEREST OR TO RESTORE THE PLOT IN HIS FAVOUR AS THE SAME WAS REFUNDED TO HIM AS PER HUDA POLICY. FURTHER AS PER ORDERS DATED 26.10.2005 OF DCF FARIDABAD HUDA WAS DIRECTED TO RE-ALLOT THE SAID PLOTTO THE APPLICANT ON SIMILAR PRICE AND IF THE SAME IS NOT FOUND TO BE VACANT/UN-ALLOTTED, THEN ANOTHER PLOT BE ALLOTTED TO THE APPLICANT, PAY 12% P.A. INTEREST ON THE AMOUNT DEPOSITED BY THE APPLICANT W.E.F. ITS DEDUCTION TILL THE ADJUSTMENT OF THE SAID PLOT AND ALSO TO PAY RS.50000/-&RS. 5000/- ON ACCOUNT OF MENTAL AGONY AS WELL AS COST OF LITIGATION RESPECTIVELY.	Disposed Off	October 28,2016	We accordingly allow these appeals but only in part and to the extent indicated above and set aside the order passed by the National Commission and the State Commission with the direction that subject to the appellant depositing the price of the plot at the rate of Rs.18,000/- per square meters within a period of six months from today the appellant shall be permitted to retain the plot. In case the needful is not done within the time allowed, this appeal shall stand dismissed and order passed by National Commission and the State Commission affirmed. In any such event HUDA shall be free to dispossess the appellant from the property and resume the possession of the plot along with the superstructure, in case the superstructure is not removed by the appellants within the time granted by HUDA for that purpose	No		January 6,2015	Faridabad	Yes	Arun Bhardwaj	LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2013/0043
8	SLP	13036	2014	April 16,2014	HUDA VS. SUNRISE ENGINEERING	SUPREME COURT	DELHI	Faridabad		Disposed Off	May 21,2015	The Special Leave petition is dismissed.				Faridabad	Yes	ANUBHA AGRAWAL	LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2014/008
9	SLP	15266	2016	August 12,2016	M/S BHANOT BROTHERS VS. HUDA AND ANOTHER	SUPREME COURT	DELHI	Faridabad	LAC MATTER	Disposed Off	July 1,2016	No ground for interference is made out to exercise our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The special leave petition is dismissed. However, it is open for the respondent - Haryana Urban Development Authority to consider the petitioners application, if it is permissible in law. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.	No			Faridabad	Yes		LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0029
10	SLP	16438	2016	September 8,2016	STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS VS. MAYA RAM (D) THEIR LRS	SUPREME COURT	DELHI	Faridabad	LAC MATTER (JUDGEMENT RESERVED ON 13.12.2017)	Disposed Off	February 16, 2018	DISPOSED of on 16.02.2018	No			Faridabad	Yes		LR/UE001/SC-DELHI/2016/0032